Re: Planet X: Red Light BENDING as Predicted
Rudolph_X wrote in message <3DA456CF.8050308@please.com>
> It is becoming more and more obvious that the desperate Zetatalk
> detractors are living in Lala Land. They don't respond to the valid
> issues and points given, and have been reduced to making personal
> attacks on posters because they lack any sound arguments. It's now
> apparent that they don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to
> refuting the overwhelming proofs given. If they have any sound
> arguments, it would better serve their cause to spell them out here and
> now, and not to resort to name calling and personal attacks. But, where
> are these counter arguments? I don't see any thing but insults and name
> calling coming from them... -RX
Try to look at it from their side though... what else can they do in the face of
strong evidence now once again presenting itself? I fear they are going to find
the struggle becoming increasing futile and with only their claws revealing to show!
I strongly believe that these Oct 4, 2002 images when analyzed in conjunction with
the Sept 21, 2002 images and comparing the trends and spots in question with the
Zeta's providing the coordinates and the where, what, how and when PX would manifest
offers undeniable proof and hard evidence that there is a new object tracking on
those images and being Planet X - not noise or bad pixels! This is light from space
showing up on the images!
Even though the admittedly special case characteristics of this object with what
the Z's have said and what has appeared on these images may challenge conventional
astronomical observation, I believe the recent explanations the Zeta's have provided
with regards to this behaviour as is being seen on the images makes very whole and
complete sense and is only being proven true through observation and analysis of these
images.
Certainly there will be more images and analysis from varying parties as the months go
on and I fully expect the trend will continue strongly with the truth becoming increasingly,
blaringly, obvious.
The Zeta's have also provided some explanations on the last couple of IRC chats...
(NancyL) ZT: Movement is obvious, and will be documented by you and your coworkers in this
effort accordingly.
(NancyL) ZT: Planet X is appearing in only one spot on the images, and what is commonly
termed white light appearing at the coordiantes spot given.
(NancyL) ZT: However, there can be ghosts, caused by reflection, that can appear NEAR an object.
(NancyL) ZT: This is a complex subject related to atmosphere, camera function, and even
Moon bounce, so we decline to expand upon it.
(NancyL) ZT: Suffice it to say that you should look for the STRONGEST red object in
accordance with what is expected in coordinates motion, and in relation to the
white light object, and in accordance with lattitude and time of exposure, etc.
(NancyL) ZT: Consider any ghosts you pick up to be that.
(NancyL) ZT: At present, the actions of disinfo artists are to insult and claim loudly that
nothing is there.
(NancyL) ZT: There in fact is no organized plan beyond this, as it was know that at some
point an object, moving, WOULD be known worldwide and watched, and the silence of
NASA and the Hubble on this matter rather obvious.
(NancyL) ZT: Nonetheless, we expect silence to be the plan, as announcing that SOMETHING is
there would be to give ZT credit and prestige.
(NancyL) ZT: When it become large enough to be seen by the eye, without scopes, we expect an
explanation akin to a red comet, red dust, outgassing, a brilliant display.
(NancyL) ZT: The course of this supposed comet will be such that no damage will occur to
Earth, of course, as comets are seen as brilliant and have tails.
(NancyL) ZT: But since much time may pass between this current plan in place and the
execution of the plan, and since this is in the hands of man, all could change.
http://www.zetatalk.com/index/coct0502.htm
http://www.zetatalk.com/index/csep2802.htm
Steve Havas