Re: Planet X: MAY Coordinates

Bill Nelson wrote:
> Nancy Lieder wrote:
>> The Zetas are advising setting equipment for Magnitude 10
>> or a higher number, and filtering FOR red (not filtering
>> red out).  Its size is smaller than Pluto at present, and it is
>> NOT reflecting sunlight as Pluto is, at present.
>
> That eliminates Havas's sighting, since he reported a diffuse object.
> An object "smaller than Pluto" would be a point source.

It would also eliminate most of what the Hubble is looking at.  Why is
it we can't put all the particulars together on one page, here, Bill?
Is it that you can't do that?  Observatory scopes zoom the image, make
it LARGER, and then one sees that the light coming from the surface is a
dull glow from this smoldering brown dwarf - diffuse.  If the Hubble or
an observatory scope looks at a distant star, it sees an intense light
in the center of the view - a pinpoint.

Greg Neill wrote:
> According to your own data (size and distance), it must subtend
> an arc of about 10^-5 degrees as viewed from Earth.  That's
> essentially a point source, and would be so to Hubble as well.

Give me a break!  We detail images of the surface of the moons of
Jupiter, cracks in the ice of Europa, and no magnification is going on?