Re: Challenge to Jim Scotti

Article: <6kl0p7$bu7@sjx-ixn2.ix.netcom.com> 
Subject: Re: Challenge to Jim Scotti
Date: 29 May 1998 00:50:47 GMT

Below, ZetatTalk on Gravity Flow, as requested to be posted by the
Zetas

................
ZetaTalk: Gravity Flow

The flow of gravity particles is not unlike the magnetism model, but
with several significant differences.  In magnetism, particle flow is
related to the shape of atoms, such as iron, which allow a flow to
begin in the first place, and is related to the types of bonds these
atoms commonly lock themselves in.  Magnetic particles surge out of a
break in the rhythm of subatomic particles such as electrons circling
the nucleus, a surge which does not occur in other atoms that have a
more even balance in their halo of orbiting electrons.  Magnetism thus
produces a field, with a flow, and this flow is discernible to the
degree that one could almost imagine a river, watching magnetized
particles on the river position themselves according to the flow.

Gravity particles produce a flow but produce no discernible flow, and
have no irregularities in the pattern.  Does your Earth not pull evenly
from all parts of its surface?  And if there is a flow, then at what
point does the flow reverse, such that surface particles are pushed
away?  In fact there is a reversal, but the outward streams are
propelled, with a force and at a speed so much greater than the
downward drafts that this occurs over less of a surface area and
without engaging the mass of the object.  A laser of gravity particles,
versus a floodlight upon the return.  So why would the weight of
returning particles be the only ones mankind is aware of, and why would
they not feel the violent lift of the updrafts?  The updrafts blast
through, tearing a hole as it were, where the returning particles do
not tear what they press upon, and so have the greater effect.

Gravity particles, in their motion, do not affect what they move
against or through, the effect being in essence mechanical.  The upward
drafts push aside other matter, letting it return upon completion of
the updraft, leaving no trace of the temporary tear.  The downward push
of gravity particles returning to the large mass they are attracted to,
the core of the Earth for instance, spread out upon objects they
encounter, taking some time to drift through these object and with a
constant downward press during the motion of this drift.  Thus,
returning particles, due to the time they spend upon and within the
surface objects, and due to their continual direction of motion, are a
mechanical force that is stronger, overall, than the updraft of
particles that quickly pass through the surface objects, essentially
pushing them aside rather than engaging them.

The nature of this gravity flow is what determines the repulsion force
we speak of.  It is a complement of gravity only when large bodies are
close to each other.  The updrafts, when encountering a large body also
exuding updrafts of gravity particles, hold the bodies apart.  This
occurs at what humans would call a distance from each other, as small
objects such as satellites do not exude updrafts and if far enough from
the surface of a gravitational giant such as a planet, find a
down-draft and updraft of gravity particles in balance, what humans
might term in their ignorance a zero gravity field, weightlessness.  At
this point the updrafts are still tearing through, but at a slower
rate, so that a mechanical push upward is involved, and the down-drafts
are more thinly dispersed over the surface as they work their way
through the density of these objects in space.  Large bodies, exuding
their own updrafts of gravity particles, create a situation where their
updrafts and the updrafts from another sun or planet bump against each
other, creating a buffer and preventing the gravity masses from
touching or even approaching each other except at great distances. 

Within black holes, the down-draft still exceeds the updraft, and thus
the same rules apply.